The Paradox of Simplicity in Architecture: Unpacking the Complexity Behind Minimalist Designs
- Wihan Scholtz
- Dec 30, 2025
- 4 min read
Simplicity in architecture often creates a curious paradox. Buildings that look straightforward and unadorned can seem easy to design at first glance. Yet, the reality is quite different. Achieving a simple, clean design requires careful thought, restraint, and precise execution. What appears effortless on the outside usually hides a long process of complex decision-making and discipline. This post explores why simple buildings are often the hardest to design, revealing the layers of complexity beneath minimalist facades.
The Illusion of Simplicity
Many people assume that simple buildings are easy to create because they lack elaborate ornamentation or complex forms. The public often equates simplicity with minimal effort. However, architects know that fewer design elements mean there is less room to hide mistakes or poor choices.
When a building has many decorative features or layers, flaws can be masked by complexity. In contrast, simple buildings expose every detail. Every line, junction, and material choice is clearly evident. This exposure makes any proportionality imbalance or misalignment immediately apparent.
For example, the Farnsworth House by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe appears to be a straightforward glass box. Yet, its design required meticulous attention to structural precision and material quality. The form's simplicity leaves no room for error, making the design process difficult.
In simple architecture:
There is no excess to disguise poor proportions.
Every element must be carefully considered.
Flaws become amplified rather than hidden.
This illusion of simplicity often leads to an underestimation of the skill and effort required to create minimalist buildings.
Decision-Making with Consequences
Simplicity demands clarity and intention in every design decision. Without decorative distractions, each choice carries more weight and must serve a clear purpose. Architects must prioritize proportion, material selection, and detailing with precision.
In complex designs, multiple materials and layers can soften the impact of a single poor decision. In simple buildings, fewer materials mean higher expectations for each one. The layout, structure, and detailing must all work together seamlessly.
Consider the Barcelona Pavilion, another Mies van der Rohe masterpiece. Its restrained palette of materials and open plan required exacting decisions about scale and proportion. The balance between stone, glass, and steel had to be perfect to achieve harmony.
Key points about decision-making in simple architecture:
Proportion takes precedence over decoration.
Fewer materials increase the importance of each choice.
Precision in layout and detailing is essential.
Every decision shapes the overall experience, making the design process a careful exercise in intentionality.

Restraint as a Design Skill
Restraint is often misunderstood as a limitation in design. In reality, it is an active skill that requires confidence and discipline. Knowing what not to add is usually more complicated than adding more elements.
Architects practicing restraint carefully edit ideas rather than accumulate them. They resist unnecessary gestures that do not contribute to the building’s purpose or aesthetic. This editing process demands a strong vision and trust in quiet, subtle solutions.
For example, Tadao Ando’s works often embody restraint. His use of concrete and natural light is simple yet powerful. The absence of ornamentation forces the viewer to focus on form, space, and materiality.
Restraint involves:
Resisting the urge to overcomplicate.
Editing ideas down to their essential form.
Having confidence in understated solutions.
This skill transforms simplicity from a constraint into a source of strength.

Simplicity and Construction Reality
Simple buildings place greater pressure on construction quality and coordination. Clean, minimal designs reveal every imperfection, so accuracy on site becomes critical.
Tolerances that might go unnoticed in complex buildings become visible in simple ones. Poor detailing or misaligned joints are readily apparent. This visibility means builders and architects must work closely together to ensure the design intent is realized.
For instance, the Apple Store in New York City features large glass panels with minimal framing. The construction required extreme precision to maintain the clean aesthetic. Any deviation would have compromised the building’s visual clarity.
In simple architecture:
Construction tolerances become highly visible.
Poor detailing is exposed immediately.
Collaboration between builders and architects is essential.
The success of a simple building depends as much on execution as on design.
Simplicity and Building Experience
Simple buildings often create powerful experiences through their clarity and focus. By removing distractions, they highlight light, space, and material in ways that complex designs may not.
Minimalist architecture can evoke calmness, order, and timelessness. The absence of excess allows occupants to engage more deeply with the environment. This emotional impact is a key reason why architects pursue simplicity despite its challenges.
For example, the Church of the Light by Tadao Ando uses simple concrete walls and a cross-shaped opening to create a profound spiritual atmosphere. The design’s simplicity intensifies the experience of light and shadow.
Simplicity in architecture:
Enhances the sensory experience.
Creates spaces that feel open and calm.
Encourages focus on essential elements.
This emotional resonance is the reward for the hard work behind a simple design.
Simple buildings are not simple to design. They demand rigorous thought, intentional decisions, and skilled restraint. Their success depends on precision in both design and construction. When executed well, simplicity reveals a powerful beauty that appears effortless yet results from deep expertise.



Comments